What is the difference between judicial, quasi-judicial, and administrative processes?
Too add to the question, let’s say you have a judge who renders decisions based on hearsay evidence, without finding of fact or conclusions of law. Would that be considered judicial, quasi-judicial, or administrative process, or would that be considered acting outside of their subject matter jurisdiction. Most importantly, would it be considered enforceable or void?
administrative, between, Difference, judicial, processes, quasijudicial
That would be considered judicial. And it would be fully enforceable unless it is successfully appealed or reviewed by a higher authority or court.
A quasi-judicial body is an individual or organization which has powers resembling those of a court of law or judge and is able to remedy a situation or impose legal penalties on a person or organization. So an actual judge would no be involved as such, because then is would be judicial rather than quasi-judicial. An administrative process would not usually be concerned with hearsay evidence. It would be something like a High Court Judicial Review (which is both a judicial and administrative process).