<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Law Advice &#187; U.S.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawadvice.ws/tag/u-s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawadvice.ws</link>
	<description>Lawful Advice for Legal Situations and Litigious Problems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 08:58:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Supreme Court Denies Insurer&#8217;s Motion To Stay Reinstated $ 92.9M Judgment</title>
		<link>http://www.lawadvice.ws/u-s-supreme-court-denies-insurers-motion-to-stay-reinstated-92-9m-judgment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawadvice.ws/u-s-supreme-court-denies-insurers-motion-to-stay-reinstated-92-9m-judgment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[92.9M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reinstated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawadvice.ws/u-s-supreme-court-denies-insurers-motion-to-stay-reinstated-92-9m-judgment/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WASHINGTON, D.C. &#8211; The U.S. Supreme Court on Jan. 31 denied an insurer&#8217;s motion to stay pending the filing and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari of a $ 92.9 million judgment that was reinstated against it in a class action lawsuit arising from hurricanes Katrina and Rita (Louisiana Citizens v. Oubre, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON, D.C. &#8211; The U.S. Supreme Court on Jan. 31 denied an insurer&#8217;s motion to stay pending the filing and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari of a $ 92.9 million judgment that was reinstated against it in a class action lawsuit arising from hurricanes Katrina and Rita (Louisiana Citizens v. Oubre, et al., No. 11A717, U.S. Sup.).<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/lexisnexis/topstories/~4/2gBlIOwnFdY" height="1" width="1"/></p>
<p>View full post on <a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/lexisnexis/topstories/~3/2gBlIOwnFdY/xlink" >LexisNexis® Mealey&#8217;s™ Daily Legal News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawadvice.ws/u-s-supreme-court-denies-insurers-motion-to-stay-reinstated-92-9m-judgment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Health Reform Law Gaining Wider Acceptance &#8211; U.S. News &amp; World Report</title>
		<link>http://www.lawadvice.ws/health-reform-law-gaining-wider-acceptance-u-s-news-world-report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawadvice.ws/health-reform-law-gaining-wider-acceptance-u-s-news-world-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acceptance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawadvice.ws/health-reform-law-gaining-wider-acceptance-u-s-news-world-report/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Health Reform Law Gaining Wider AcceptanceU.S. News &#038; World Report30 (HealthDay News) &#8212; Americans are slowly starting to embrace some key components of the controversial health care reform act signed into law by President Barack Obama nearly two years ago, a new Harris Interactive/HealthDay poll found.Parts of Health Reform Law Gaining in Acceptance: PollMarketWatch (press [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="7" style="vertical-align:top;">
<tr>
<td width="80" align="center" valign="top"><font style="font-size:85%;font-family:arial,sans-serif"></font></td>
<td valign="top" class="j"><font style="font-size:85%;font-family:arial,sans-serif">
<div style="padding-top:0.8em;"><img alt="" height="1" width="1" /></div>
<div class="lh"><a target="_blank" href="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&amp;fd=R&amp;usg=AFQjCNF__zzi0pnyl3HB56wJEPt-D0Axtg&amp;url=http://www.usnews.com/articles/health-news/managing-your-healthcare/2012/01/30/health-reform-law-gaining-wider-acceptance-poll.html" ><b>Health Reform <b>Law</b> Gaining Wider Acceptance</b></a><br /><font size="-1"><b><font color="#6f6f6f">U.S. News &#038; World Report</font></b></font><br /><font size="-1">30 (HealthDay News) &#8212; Americans are slowly starting to embrace some key components of the controversial health care reform act signed into <b>law</b> by President Barack Obama nearly two years ago, a new Harris Interactive/HealthDay poll found.</font><br /><font size="-1"><a target="_blank" href="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&amp;fd=R&amp;usg=AFQjCNEvrE7DStbZVF-yKh5C6NL00a6epQ&amp;url=http://www.marketwatch.com/story/parts-of-health-reform-law-gaining-in-acceptance-poll-2012-01-30" >Parts of Health Reform <b>Law</b> Gaining in Acceptance: Poll</a><font size="-1" color="#6f6f6f"><nobr>MarketWatch (press release)</nobr></font></font><br /><font size="-1" class="p"></font><br /><font class="p" size="-1"><a target="_blank" href="http://news.google.com/news/more?pz=1&amp;ned=us&amp;ncl=dqY5uKjNPFw3jZMm7ElsOROOYpjRM" class="p" ><nobr><b>all 21 news articles&nbsp;&raquo;</b></nobr></a></font></div>
<p></font></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>View full post on <a target="_blank" href="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&#038;fd=R&#038;usg=AFQjCNF__zzi0pnyl3HB56wJEPt-D0Axtg&#038;url=http://www.usnews.com/articles/health-news/managing-your-healthcare/2012/01/30/health-reform-law-gaining-wider-acceptance-poll.html" >law &#8211; Google News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawadvice.ws/health-reform-law-gaining-wider-acceptance-u-s-news-world-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keystone Bill Raises &#8216;Legal Questions,&#8217; U.S. Official Says &#8211; Bloomberg</title>
		<link>http://www.lawadvice.ws/keystone-bill-raises-legal-questions-u-s-official-says-bloomberg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawadvice.ws/keystone-bill-raises-legal-questions-u-s-official-says-bloomberg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Official]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Questions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawadvice.ws/keystone-bill-raises-legal-questions-u-s-official-says-bloomberg/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Politico Keystone Bill Raises &#39;Legal Questions,&#39; U.S. Official SaysBloomberg(TRP)&#39;s Keystone XL pipeline raises “serious questions” about legal authority, a State Department official said. The legislation offered after the Obama administration denied a permit for the project also “appears to override foreign-policy and &#8230;Obama administration says GOP pipeline bill raises &#39;serious&#39; legal questionsWashington PostState Dept: House [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="7" style="vertical-align:top;">
<tr>
<td width="80" align="center" valign="top"><font style="font-size:85%;font-family:arial,sans-serif"><a target="_blank" href="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&amp;fd=R&amp;usg=AFQjCNFvYb4ezwXVfeAJUle1_8ii4vBKWQ&amp;url=http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0112/71860.html" ><img src="//nt3.ggpht.com/news/tbn/k68ej51bARQR7M/6.jpg" alt="" border="1" width="80" height="80" /><br /><font size="-2">Politico</font></a></font></td>
<td valign="top" class="j"><font style="font-size:85%;font-family:arial,sans-serif">
<div style="padding-top:0.8em;"><img alt="" height="1" width="1" /></div>
<div class="lh"><a target="_blank" href="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&amp;fd=R&amp;usg=AFQjCNGOJ_JwvynJjmbxBBEC8D01cuUm-w&amp;url=http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-25/keystone-bill-raises-legal-questions-u-s-official-says-1-.html" ><b>Keystone Bill Raises &#39;<b>Legal</b> Questions,&#39; U.S. Official Says</b></a><br /><font size="-1"><b><font color="#6f6f6f">Bloomberg</font></b></font><br /><font size="-1">(TRP)&#39;s Keystone XL pipeline raises “serious questions” about <b>legal</b> authority, a State Department official said. The legislation offered after the Obama administration denied a permit for the project also “appears to override foreign-policy and <b>&#8230;</b></font><br /><font size="-1"><a target="_blank" href="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&amp;fd=R&amp;usg=AFQjCNFyZ8TVgCMhaG_bhkHM4R0m8eOoiA&amp;url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/federal-government/obama-administration-says-gop-pipeline-bill-raises-serious-legal-questions/2012/01/25/gIQA8Gf7PQ_story.html" >Obama administration says GOP pipeline bill raises &#39;serious&#39; <b>legal</b> questions</a><font size="-1" color="#6f6f6f"><nobr>Washington Post</nobr></font></font><br /><font size="-1"><a target="_blank" href="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&amp;fd=R&amp;usg=AFQjCNHSgB05UIdfSBBjqIJ9cvN2-tjIAg&amp;url=http://af.reuters.com/article/commoditiesNews/idAFL2E8CP2TI20120125" >State Dept: House Keystone bill raises <b>legal</b> questions</a><font size="-1" color="#6f6f6f"><nobr>Reuters Africa</nobr></font></font><br /><font size="-1" class="p"></font><br /><font class="p" size="-1"><a target="_blank" href="http://news.google.com/news/more?pz=1&amp;ned=us&amp;ncl=dIIIk782gBe7MoMdw8UGlY2jB25vM" class="p" ><nobr><b>all 590 news articles&nbsp;&raquo;</b></nobr></a></font></div>
<p></font></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>View full post on <a target="_blank" href="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&#038;fd=R&#038;usg=AFQjCNGOJ_JwvynJjmbxBBEC8D01cuUm-w&#038;url=http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-25/keystone-bill-raises-legal-questions-u-s-official-says-1-.html" >legal &#8211; Google News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawadvice.ws/keystone-bill-raises-legal-questions-u-s-official-says-bloomberg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>1st Circuit affirms awards against U.S. over Bulger gang murders</title>
		<link>http://www.lawadvice.ws/1st-circuit-affirms-awards-against-u-s-over-bulger-gang-murders/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawadvice.ws/1st-circuit-affirms-awards-against-u-s-over-bulger-gang-murders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affirms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[against]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[murders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[over]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawadvice.ws/1st-circuit-affirms-awards-against-u-s-over-bulger-gang-murders/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a pair of rulings, the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed nearly $2.9 million in awards to the families of three murder victims killed by mobsters Whitey Bulger and Steve Flemmi while they were government informants. View full post on Law.com &#8211; Newswire]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a pair of rulings, the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed nearly $2.9 million in awards to the families of three murder victims killed by mobsters Whitey Bulger and Steve Flemmi while they were government informants.</p>
<p>View full post on <a target="_blank" href="http://www.law.com/jsp/law/sign_me_in.jsp?article=http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202539677304&#038;rss=newswire" >Law.com &#8211; Newswire</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawadvice.ws/1st-circuit-affirms-awards-against-u-s-over-bulger-gang-murders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Takeda Calif. Unit&#8217;s Work On Actos Is Enough To Remand, U.S. Judge Says</title>
		<link>http://www.lawadvice.ws/takeda-calif-units-work-on-actos-is-enough-to-remand-u-s-judge-says/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawadvice.ws/takeda-calif-units-work-on-actos-is-enough-to-remand-u-s-judge-says/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 05:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Actos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Calif]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ENOUGH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Takeda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[units]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawadvice.ws/takeda-calif-units-work-on-actos-is-enough-to-remand-u-s-judge-says/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SAN FRANCISCO &#8211; The involvement of a Takeda Pharmaceuticals San Diego subsidiary in the testing of the company&#8217;s anti-diabetes drug Actos created a reasonable possibility that the company would be liable under California state law, a federal judge ruled Jan. 20 in remanding a bladder cancer case to state court (Jerry Hill v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SAN FRANCISCO &#8211; The involvement of a Takeda Pharmaceuticals San Diego subsidiary in the testing of the company&#8217;s anti-diabetes drug Actos created a reasonable possibility that the company would be liable under California state law, a federal judge ruled Jan. 20 in remanding a bladder cancer case to state court (Jerry Hill v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc., et al., No. 11-5637, N.D. Calif.; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6451).<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/lexisnexis/topstories/~4/ojKS51OwAWI" height="1" width="1"/></p>
<p>View full post on <a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/lexisnexis/topstories/~3/ojKS51OwAWI/xlink" >LexisNexis® Mealey&#8217;s™ Daily Legal News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawadvice.ws/takeda-calif-units-work-on-actos-is-enough-to-remand-u-s-judge-says/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AMR&#8217;s Request to Hire Law Firms, Advisers Questioned by U.S. Trustee &#8211; Bloomberg</title>
		<link>http://www.lawadvice.ws/amrs-request-to-hire-law-firms-advisers-questioned-by-u-s-trustee-bloomberg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawadvice.ws/amrs-request-to-hire-law-firms-advisers-questioned-by-u-s-trustee-bloomberg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 02:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMR's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Questioned]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[request]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trustee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawadvice.ws/amrs-request-to-hire-law-firms-advisers-questioned-by-u-s-trustee-bloomberg/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AMR&#39;s Request to Hire Law Firms, Advisers Questioned by U.S. TrusteeBloomberg(AAMRQ)&#39;s request to hire four law firms in addition to main bankruptcy counsel Weil, Gotshal &#38; Manges LLP was questioned by the US Trustee, who is seeking more disclosure about Weil and Debevoise &#38; Plimpton LLP. AMR, which is reorganizing its American &#8230;and more&#160;&#187; View [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="7" style="vertical-align:top;">
<tr>
<td width="80" align="center" valign="top"><font style="font-size:85%;font-family:arial,sans-serif"></font></td>
<td valign="top" class="j"><font style="font-size:85%;font-family:arial,sans-serif">
<div style="padding-top:0.8em;"><img alt="" height="1" width="1" /></div>
<div class="lh"><a target="_blank" href="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&amp;fd=R&amp;usg=AFQjCNFBN1zreZ65fHyLDpOOVyjtZoq9-A&amp;url=http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-24/amr-s-request-to-hire-law-firms-advisers-questioned-by-u-s-trustee.html" ><b>AMR&#39;s Request to Hire <b>Law</b> Firms, Advisers Questioned by U.S. Trustee</b></a><br /><font size="-1"><b><font color="#6f6f6f">Bloomberg</font></b></font><br /><font size="-1">(AAMRQ)&#39;s request to hire four <b>law</b> firms in addition to main bankruptcy counsel Weil, Gotshal &amp; Manges LLP was questioned by the US Trustee, who is seeking more disclosure about Weil and Debevoise &amp; Plimpton LLP. AMR, which is reorganizing its American <b>&#8230;</b></font><br /><font size="-1" class="p"></font><br /><font class="p" size="-1"><a target="_blank" href="http://news.google.com/news/more?pz=1&amp;ned=us&amp;ncl=dCzm8rhf0RZfldM" class="p" ><nobr><b>and more&nbsp;&raquo;</b></nobr></a></font></div>
<p></font></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>View full post on <a target="_blank" href="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&#038;fd=R&#038;usg=AFQjCNFBN1zreZ65fHyLDpOOVyjtZoq9-A&#038;url=http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-24/amr-s-request-to-hire-law-firms-advisers-questioned-by-u-s-trustee.html" >law &#8211; Google News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawadvice.ws/amrs-request-to-hire-law-firms-advisers-questioned-by-u-s-trustee-bloomberg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Supreme Court Refuses To Hear Law Firm&#8217;s Appeal Regarding Debt Collection</title>
		<link>http://www.lawadvice.ws/u-s-supreme-court-refuses-to-hear-law-firms-appeal-regarding-debt-collection/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawadvice.ws/u-s-supreme-court-refuses-to-hear-law-firms-appeal-regarding-debt-collection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refuses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regarding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawadvice.ws/u-s-supreme-court-refuses-to-hear-law-firms-appeal-regarding-debt-collection/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WASHINGTON, D.C. &#8211; The U.S. Supreme Court on Jan. 23 declined to hear a case in which the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals had determined that a law firm&#8217;s communication with a Chapter 13 debtor pertaining to the foreclosure of her home was a violation of federal debt collection law (Fein, Such, Kahn &#038; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON, D.C. &#8211; The U.S. Supreme Court on Jan. 23 declined to hear a case in which the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals had determined that a law firm&#8217;s communication with a Chapter 13 debtor pertaining to the foreclosure of her home was a violation of federal debt collection law (Fein, Such, Kahn &#038; Shepard v. Dorothy Rhue Allen, No. 10-1417, Chapter 13, U.S. Sup.).<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/lexisnexis/topstories/~4/Ae7rJWwOHxc" height="1" width="1"/></p>
<p>View full post on <a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/lexisnexis/topstories/~3/Ae7rJWwOHxc/xlink" >LexisNexis® Mealey&#8217;s™ Daily Legal News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawadvice.ws/u-s-supreme-court-refuses-to-hear-law-firms-appeal-regarding-debt-collection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge Upholds Denial of Permit for &#8216;Occupy&#8217; Protest at U.S. Court</title>
		<link>http://www.lawadvice.ws/judge-upholds-denial-of-permit-for-occupy-protest-at-u-s-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawadvice.ws/judge-upholds-denial-of-permit-for-occupy-protest-at-u-s-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 06:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[occupy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[permit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upholds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawadvice.ws/judge-upholds-denial-of-permit-for-occupy-protest-at-u-s-court/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The &#8220;Occupy the Courts&#8221; group has been denied permission to demonstrate outside a Manhattan courthouse as part of a national day of protests near federal courthouses over Citizens United, which prohibits the government from limiting independent spending for political purposes by corporations and unions. View full post on Law.com &#8211; Newswire]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;Occupy the Courts&#8221; group has been denied permission to demonstrate outside a Manhattan courthouse as part of a national day of protests near federal courthouses over Citizens United, which prohibits the government from limiting independent spending for political purposes by corporations and unions.</p>
<p>View full post on <a target="_blank" href="http://www.law.com/jsp/law/sign_me_in.jsp?article=http://www.law.com/jsp/nylj/PubArticleNY.jsp?id=1202539007592&#038;rss=newswire" >Law.com &#8211; Newswire</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawadvice.ws/judge-upholds-denial-of-permit-for-occupy-protest-at-u-s-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Law Review Leads to Legal Jobs, Recruiters Say &#8211; U.S. News &amp; World Report</title>
		<link>http://www.lawadvice.ws/law-review-leads-to-legal-jobs-recruiters-say-u-s-news-world-report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawadvice.ws/law-review-leads-to-legal-jobs-recruiters-say-u-s-news-world-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recruiters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawadvice.ws/law-review-leads-to-legal-jobs-recruiters-say-u-s-news-world-report/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Law Review Leads to Legal Jobs, Recruiters SayU.S. News &#038; World ReportFor those who can&#39;t make law review, other legal journals may offer similar experience. By Menachem Wecker There are a lot of options for law students who want to publish legal research. At Yale Law School, for example, students can write for journals &#8230;and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="7" style="vertical-align:top;">
<tr>
<td width="80" align="center" valign="top"><font style="font-size:85%;font-family:arial,sans-serif"></font></td>
<td valign="top" class="j"><font style="font-size:85%;font-family:arial,sans-serif">
<div style="padding-top:0.8em;"><img alt="" height="1" width="1" /></div>
<div class="lh"><a target="_blank" href="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&amp;fd=R&amp;usg=AFQjCNHH2h_Xrp7LCjyNHJDLqFzfLvC_Xg&amp;url=http://www.usnews.com/education/top-law-schools/articles/2012/01/19/law-review-leads-to-legal-jobs-recruiters-say" ><b>Law Review Leads to <b>Legal</b> Jobs, Recruiters Say</b></a><br /><font size="-1"><b><font color="#6f6f6f">U.S. News &#038; World Report</font></b></font><br /><font size="-1">For those who can&#39;t make law review, other <b>legal</b> journals may offer similar experience. By Menachem Wecker There are a lot of options for law students who want to publish <b>legal</b> research. At Yale Law School, for example, students can write for journals <b>&#8230;</b></font><br /><font size="-1" class="p"></font><br /><font class="p" size="-1"><a target="_blank" href="http://news.google.com/news/more?pz=1&amp;ned=us&amp;ncl=dQ-yHhvIzKG8etM" class="p" ><nobr><b>and more&nbsp;&raquo;</b></nobr></a></font></div>
<p></font></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>View full post on <a target="_blank" href="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&#038;fd=R&#038;usg=AFQjCNHH2h_Xrp7LCjyNHJDLqFzfLvC_Xg&#038;url=http://www.usnews.com/education/top-law-schools/articles/2012/01/19/law-review-leads-to-legal-jobs-recruiters-say" >legal &#8211; Google News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawadvice.ws/law-review-leads-to-legal-jobs-recruiters-say-u-s-news-world-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Insurer Drops Subrogation Suit Against U.S. Navy; Judge Enters Order Of Dismissal</title>
		<link>http://www.lawadvice.ws/insurer-drops-subrogation-suit-against-u-s-navy-judge-enters-order-of-dismissal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawadvice.ws/insurer-drops-subrogation-suit-against-u-s-navy-judge-enters-order-of-dismissal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 01:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[against]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dismissal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subrogation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawadvice.ws/insurer-drops-subrogation-suit-against-u-s-navy-judge-enters-order-of-dismissal/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[KEY WEST, Fla. &#8211; A Florida federal judge on Jan 10 entered an order of dismissal after an insurer that was seeking reimbursement for costs incurred by its insured for a jet fuel cleanup notified the court that it was dropping its subrogation claim against the U.S. Navy and others (Gotham Insurance Co., as subrogee [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KEY WEST, Fla. &#8211; A Florida federal judge on Jan 10 entered an order of dismissal after an insurer that was seeking reimbursement for costs incurred by its insured for a jet fuel cleanup notified the court that it was dropping its subrogation claim against the U.S. Navy and others (Gotham Insurance Co., as subrogee of KeyWest Pipeline Co., v. The Defense Logistics Agency f/k/a Defense Energy Support Center &#8211; America&#8217;s East and the United States Navy [KeyWest Naval Air Facility], No. 11-10081, S.D. Fla.).<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/lexisnexis/topstories/~4/DW1uGAYuicY" height="1" width="1"/></p>
<p>View full post on <a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/lexisnexis/topstories/~3/DW1uGAYuicY/xlink" >LexisNexis® Mealey&#8217;s™ Daily Legal News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawadvice.ws/insurer-drops-subrogation-suit-against-u-s-navy-judge-enters-order-of-dismissal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

