Law Advice

Daily Mail DoT to see legal implications of SC order before any actionHindustan TimesThe department of telecom will study the legal implications of the Supreme Court order cancelling 122 2G telecom licenses before deciding on the future course of action. "DoT has to first study legal implications of the order. It will require some time [...]

Department of Telecom examining legal implications of SC order on 2G licenses …Economic TimesNEW DELHI: The Department of Telecom will study the legal implications of the Supreme Court order cancelling 122 2G telecom licenses before deciding on the future course of action. "DoT has to first study legal implications of the order.and more » View full [...]

India Today DoT examining legal implications of SC order before any actionHindustan TimesThe department of telecom will study the legal implications of the Supreme Court order cancelling 122 2G telecom licenses before deciding on the future course of action. "DoT has to first study legal implications of the order. It will require some time …2G [...]

ROCHESTER, NY – The Fourth Department New York Supreme Court Appellate Division on Jan. 31 affirmed a trial court decision ordering the New York State Department of Health and its commissioner, Richard F. Daines, to reimburse Niagara County for Medicaid expenditures known as “overburden expenditures” (In the Matter of County of Niagara v. Richard F. [...]

A federal appellate panel ruled on Thursday that a San Francisco judge abused his discretion by ordering the release of a video recording of the trial over California’s Proposition 8, saying that he ignored a promise upon which supporters of the ban on gay marriage relied. View full post on Law.com – Newswire

CINCINNATI – The Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Jan. 31 upheld a National Labor Relations Board decision finding that Jackson Hospital Corp., doing business as Kentucky River Medical Center, violated the National Labor Relations Act when it fired eight employees because of their union support and participation in a strike and must pay [...]

SAN JOSE, Calif. – A federal judge in California on Jan. 23 denied a woman’s ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO) and a preliminary injunction barring the sale or transfer of a condominium she lost to foreclosure after finding that her request was procedurally defective and that her claim under the Uniform [...]

DENVER – A federal judge in Colorado on Jan. 20 issued an opinion and order nunc pro tunc making two corrections to a 2011 ruling that although lead plaintiffs in a multidistrict litigation have failed to plead their claim under Section 13(a) of the Investment Company Act, they have properly pleaded all other federal securities [...]

DENVER – A Colorado federal judge on Jan. 20 granted a motion for temporary stay of a previous order that granted a request by the Republic of Ecuador to compel production of documents for use in a foreign arbitration case, finding that the public interest was satisfied by granting the stay and that Ecuador would [...]

A New York federal judge has rejected Ernst & Young’s claims that an individual plaintiff is required to arbitrate her overtime claims individually instead of through a class action in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s holding in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion. View full post on Law.com – Newswire