<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Law Advice &#187; Liability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawadvice.ws/tag/liability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawadvice.ws</link>
	<description>Lawful Advice for Legal Situations and Litigious Problems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:41:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Insurer&#8217;s Parent Company Dismissed From UIM Suit For Lack Of Vicarious Liability</title>
		<link>http://www.lawadvice.ws/insurers-parent-company-dismissed-from-uim-suit-for-lack-of-vicarious-liability/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawadvice.ws/insurers-parent-company-dismissed-from-uim-suit-for-lack-of-vicarious-liability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 04:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dismissed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[from]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vicarious]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawadvice.ws/insurers-parent-company-dismissed-from-uim-suit-for-lack-of-vicarious-liability/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LAS VEGAS &#8211; A Nevada federal judge on Jan. 31 held that although it is possible that an insurer&#8217;s parent company &#8220;had the requisite control over [its] day-to-day claim processing operations to make it vicariously liable&#8221; for breach of contract and bad faith claims in an underinsured motorist (UIM) dispute, the insured failed to allege [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LAS VEGAS &#8211; A Nevada federal judge on Jan. 31 held that although it is possible that an insurer&#8217;s parent company &#8220;had the requisite control over [its] day-to-day claim processing operations to make it vicariously liable&#8221; for breach of contract and bad faith claims in an underinsured motorist (UIM) dispute, the insured failed to allege facts establishing this (Teresa Engel, et al. v. Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest, et al., No. 2:11-cv-01103, D. Nev.; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11115).<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/lexisnexis/topstories/~4/zhDKsGHNLIk" height="1" width="1"/></p>
<p>View full post on <a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/lexisnexis/topstories/~3/zhDKsGHNLIk/xlink" >LexisNexis® Mealey&#8217;s™ Daily Legal News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawadvice.ws/insurers-parent-company-dismissed-from-uim-suit-for-lack-of-vicarious-liability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>O&#8217;Melveny Beats Back Sucessor Liability Claim Against BofA in Countrywide MBS Suit</title>
		<link>http://www.lawadvice.ws/omelveny-beats-back-sucessor-liability-claim-against-bofa-in-countrywide-mbs-suit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawadvice.ws/omelveny-beats-back-sucessor-liability-claim-against-bofa-in-countrywide-mbs-suit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 08:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[against]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Back]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BofA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Countrywide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[O'Melveny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sucessor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawadvice.ws/omelveny-beats-back-sucessor-liability-claim-against-bofa-in-countrywide-mbs-suit/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the face of the most comprehensive effort yet to keep Bank of America on the hook for alleged fraud in a Countrywide mortgage-backed securities case, a California federal district court judge has rejected Allstate&#8217;s successor liability claim against BofA. View full post on Law.com &#8211; Newswire]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the face of the most comprehensive effort yet to keep Bank of America on the hook for alleged fraud in a Countrywide mortgage-backed securities case, a California federal district court judge has rejected Allstate&#8217;s successor liability claim against BofA.</p>
<p>View full post on <a target="_blank" href="http://www.law.com/jsp/law/sign_me_in.jsp?article=http://www.law.com/jsp/tal/PubArticleTAL.jsp?id=1202541375932&#038;rss=newswire" >Law.com &#8211; Newswire</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawadvice.ws/omelveny-beats-back-sucessor-liability-claim-against-bofa-in-countrywide-mbs-suit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Louisiana Federal Judge Says Insurer Has Duty To Defend In Pollution Liability Suit</title>
		<link>http://www.lawadvice.ws/louisiana-federal-judge-says-insurer-has-duty-to-defend-in-pollution-liability-suit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawadvice.ws/louisiana-federal-judge-says-insurer-has-duty-to-defend-in-pollution-liability-suit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawadvice.ws/louisiana-federal-judge-says-insurer-has-duty-to-defend-in-pollution-liability-suit/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BATON ROUGE, La. &#8211; An insurer has a duty to defend its insured in a pollution liability suit brought by the United States because the insurer failed to prove that coverage is excluded under the policy, a Louisiana federal judge said Jan. 30 (Louisiana Generating, L.L.C., et al. v. Illinois Union Insurance Company, No. 10-cv-0516, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BATON ROUGE, La. &#8211; An insurer has a duty to defend its insured in a pollution liability suit brought by the United States because the insurer failed to prove that coverage is excluded under the policy, a Louisiana federal judge said Jan. 30 (Louisiana Generating, L.L.C., et al. v. Illinois Union Insurance Company, No. 10-cv-0516, M.D. La.).<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/lexisnexis/topstories/~4/vCz0iyKGAl8" height="1" width="1"/></p>
<p>View full post on <a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/lexisnexis/topstories/~3/vCz0iyKGAl8/xlink" >LexisNexis® Mealey&#8217;s™ Daily Legal News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawadvice.ws/louisiana-federal-judge-says-insurer-has-duty-to-defend-in-pollution-liability-suit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Johnson &amp; Johnson $ 4B Charge Includes Product Liability Costs, Recall, Settlements</title>
		<link>http://www.lawadvice.ws/johnson-johnson-4b-charge-includes-product-liability-costs-recall-settlements/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawadvice.ws/johnson-johnson-4b-charge-includes-product-liability-costs-recall-settlements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[includes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settlements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawadvice.ws/johnson-johnson-4b-charge-includes-product-liability-costs-recall-settlements/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NEW BRUNSWICK, N.J. &#8211; Johnson &#038; Johnson said Jan. 24 that it took a $ 4.2 billion after-tax charge against earnings to cover product liability expenses, litigation settlements, costs of the DePuy ASR hip recall, restructuring of its Cordis Corp. subsidiary, the acquisition of Synthes Inc. and an adjustment to the value of a currency [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEW BRUNSWICK, N.J. &#8211; Johnson &#038; Johnson said Jan. 24 that it took a $ 4.2 billion after-tax charge against earnings to cover product liability expenses, litigation settlements, costs of the DePuy ASR hip recall, restructuring of its Cordis Corp. subsidiary, the acquisition of Synthes Inc. and an adjustment to the value of a currency option.<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/lexisnexis/topstories/~4/dYPoTkIl_tg" height="1" width="1"/></p>
<p>View full post on <a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/lexisnexis/topstories/~3/dYPoTkIl_tg/xlink" >LexisNexis® Mealey&#8217;s™ Daily Legal News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawadvice.ws/johnson-johnson-4b-charge-includes-product-liability-costs-recall-settlements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Administration And Banks Near Deal On Mortgage Fraud Legal Liability &#8211; Huffington Post</title>
		<link>http://www.lawadvice.ws/obama-administration-and-banks-near-deal-on-mortgage-fraud-legal-liability-huffington-post/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawadvice.ws/obama-administration-and-banks-near-deal-on-mortgage-fraud-legal-liability-huffington-post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huffington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Near]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawadvice.ws/obama-administration-and-banks-near-deal-on-mortgage-fraud-legal-liability-huffington-post/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Los Angeles Times Obama Administration And Banks Near Deal On Mortgage Fraud Legal LiabilityHuffington PostThe final details of the arrangement, according to the source who revealed them, will apparently not preclude prosecutors and regulators from taking legal action against many of the common abuses during the house bubble. It remains to be seen whether &#8230;Fla. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="7" style="vertical-align:top;">
<tr>
<td width="80" align="center" valign="top"><font style="font-size:85%;font-family:arial,sans-serif"><a target="_blank" href="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&amp;fd=R&amp;usg=AFQjCNGs73z-VVC42G3TykZQ_GtJ9iqk6w&amp;url=http://www.latimes.com/business/money/la-fi-mo-mortgage-probe-20120126,0,6140897.story" ><img src="//nt3.ggpht.com/news/tbn/KweAFcsVoAnAjM/6.jpg" alt="" border="1" width="80" height="80" /><br /><font size="-2">Los Angeles Times</font></a></font></td>
<td valign="top" class="j"><font style="font-size:85%;font-family:arial,sans-serif">
<div style="padding-top:0.8em;"><img alt="" height="1" width="1" /></div>
<div class="lh"><a target="_blank" href="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&amp;fd=R&amp;usg=AFQjCNEiF0jmt1K1aEFphfrnp19XzS3PFA&amp;url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/27/obama-administration-mortgage-fraud-settlement_n_1236708.html" ><b>Obama Administration And Banks Near Deal On Mortgage Fraud <b>Legal</b> Liability</b></a><br /><font size="-1"><b><font color="#6f6f6f">Huffington Post</font></b></font><br /><font size="-1">The final details of the arrangement, according to the source who revealed them, will apparently not preclude prosecutors and regulators from taking <b>legal</b> action against many of the common abuses during the house bubble. It remains to be seen whether <b>&#8230;</b></font><br /><font size="-1"><a target="_blank" href="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&amp;fd=R&amp;usg=AFQjCNEL__3y5vW40oUmcT0fUkRZi8RG3Q&amp;url=http://www.legalnewsline.com/news/235024-fla.-ag-says-she-supports-foreclosure-settlement" >Fla. AG says she supports foreclosure settlement</a><font size="-1" color="#6f6f6f"><nobr>Legal News Line</nobr></font></font><br /><font size="-1"><a target="_blank" href="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&amp;fd=R&amp;usg=AFQjCNHv4fZ3GyMJUnEVquLU7mqvBlg0Wg&amp;url=http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2012/01/25/sotu-legal-highlights/" >SOTU: <b>Legal</b> Highlights</a><font size="-1" color="#6f6f6f"><nobr>Wall Street Journal (blog)</nobr></font></font><br /><font size="-1"><a target="_blank" href="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&amp;fd=R&amp;usg=AFQjCNGgq2JQK-y0mxDVYWXffB9OqowV9w&amp;url=http://bottomline.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/01/26/10244290-banks-square-in-mortgage-fraud-crosshairs-again?chromedomain%3Dusnews" >Banks square in mortgage fraud crosshairs again</a><font size="-1" color="#6f6f6f"><nobr>msnbc.com</nobr></font></font><br /><font size="-1" class="p"></font><br /><font class="p" size="-1"><a target="_blank" href="http://news.google.com/news/more?pz=1&amp;ned=us&amp;ncl=dW5uhYVFdKHmDXMcji57TPxvhFGtM" class="p" ><nobr><b>all 586 news articles&nbsp;&raquo;</b></nobr></a></font></div>
<p></font></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>View full post on <a target="_blank" href="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&#038;fd=R&#038;usg=AFQjCNEiF0jmt1K1aEFphfrnp19XzS3PFA&#038;url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/27/obama-administration-mortgage-fraud-settlement_n_1236708.html" >legal &#8211; Google News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawadvice.ws/obama-administration-and-banks-near-deal-on-mortgage-fraud-legal-liability-huffington-post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge: States&#8217; Dissimilar Liability Systems Led To Legitimate Coverage Dispute</title>
		<link>http://www.lawadvice.ws/judge-states-dissimilar-liability-systems-led-to-legitimate-coverage-dispute/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawadvice.ws/judge-states-dissimilar-liability-systems-led-to-legitimate-coverage-dispute/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 02:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dissimilar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legitimate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Systems]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawadvice.ws/judge-states-dissimilar-liability-systems-led-to-legitimate-coverage-dispute/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OKLAHOMA CITY &#8211; An Oklahoma man who was involved in an accident in Minnesota fell short of establishing that his insurer acted in bad faith, an Oklahoma federal judge ruled Jan. 18, finding instead that the parties&#8217; lack of knowledge of the two states&#8217; insurance systems merely caused &#8220;a legitimate dispute over coverage&#8221; (Joe J. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OKLAHOMA CITY &#8211; An Oklahoma man who was involved in an accident in Minnesota fell short of establishing that his insurer acted in bad faith, an Oklahoma federal judge ruled Jan. 18, finding instead that the parties&#8217; lack of knowledge of the two states&#8217; insurance systems merely caused &#8220;a legitimate dispute over coverage&#8221; (Joe J. Huffman v. United Financial Casualty Co., No. 5:10-cv-01139, W.D. Okla.; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5561).<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/lexisnexis/topstories/~4/F-1DG9xz4c4" height="1" width="1"/></p>
<p>View full post on <a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/lexisnexis/topstories/~3/F-1DG9xz4c4/xlink" >LexisNexis® Mealey&#8217;s™ Daily Legal News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawadvice.ws/judge-states-dissimilar-liability-systems-led-to-legitimate-coverage-dispute/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>North Carolina Panel: Trial Court Erred By Dropping Premises Liability Claims</title>
		<link>http://www.lawadvice.ws/north-carolina-panel-trial-court-erred-by-dropping-premises-liability-claims/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawadvice.ws/north-carolina-panel-trial-court-erred-by-dropping-premises-liability-claims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 22:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA['erred']]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Premises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawadvice.ws/north-carolina-panel-trial-court-erred-by-dropping-premises-liability-claims/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RALEIGH, N.C. &#8211; The North Carolina Court of Appeals on Jan. 17 overturned summary judgment for the defendant in a premises liability action, ruling that the plaintiff properly alleged personal injury claims (Susan S. Shumaker v. Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, No. COA11-598, N.C. App.; 2012 N.C. App. LEXIS 14). View full post on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RALEIGH, N.C. &#8211; The North Carolina Court of Appeals on Jan. 17 overturned summary judgment for the defendant in a premises liability action, ruling that the plaintiff properly alleged personal injury claims (Susan S. Shumaker v. Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, No. COA11-598, N.C. App.; 2012 N.C. App. LEXIS 14).<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/lexisnexis/topstories/~4/g-l-JE6rfUE" height="1" width="1"/></p>
<p>View full post on <a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/lexisnexis/topstories/~3/g-l-JE6rfUE/xlink" >LexisNexis® Mealey&#8217;s™ Daily Legal News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawadvice.ws/north-carolina-panel-trial-court-erred-by-dropping-premises-liability-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virginia Supreme Court Dismisses Liability For Landfill Pollution</title>
		<link>http://www.lawadvice.ws/virginia-supreme-court-dismisses-liability-for-landfill-pollution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawadvice.ws/virginia-supreme-court-dismisses-liability-for-landfill-pollution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dismisses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landfill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawadvice.ws/virginia-supreme-court-dismisses-liability-for-landfill-pollution/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RICHMOND, Va. &#8211; A divided Virginia Supreme Court reversed a trial court&#8217;s $ 9.6 million award to a couple who sued Campbell County for contamination of wells that supplied their mobile home park by an adjacent county landfill, saying Jan. 13 that the passive, gradual seepage of leachate and landfill gas into groundwater is not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RICHMOND, Va. &#8211; A divided Virginia Supreme Court reversed a trial court&#8217;s $ 9.6 million award to a couple who sued Campbell County for contamination of wells that supplied their mobile home park by an adjacent county landfill, saying Jan. 13 that the passive, gradual seepage of leachate and landfill gas into groundwater is not covered by the statutes the plaintiffs cited (Campbell County v. Claude M. Royal, et al., No. 101168, Va. Sup.; 2012 Va. LEXIS 19).<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/lexisnexis/topstories/~4/P-A6-xgTHH4" height="1" width="1"/></p>
<p>View full post on <a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/lexisnexis/topstories/~3/P-A6-xgTHH4/xlink" >LexisNexis® Mealey&#8217;s™ Daily Legal News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawadvice.ws/virginia-supreme-court-dismisses-liability-for-landfill-pollution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pennsylvania Trial Expected On Product Liability Claims Against Car Seat Maker</title>
		<link>http://www.lawadvice.ws/pennsylvania-trial-expected-on-product-liability-claims-against-car-seat-maker/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawadvice.ws/pennsylvania-trial-expected-on-product-liability-claims-against-car-seat-maker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 02:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[against]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expected]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawadvice.ws/pennsylvania-trial-expected-on-product-liability-claims-against-car-seat-maker/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JOHNSTOWN, Pa. &#8211; In anticipation of the Jan. 17 personal injury products liability trial in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania of claims for chemical exposure brought on behalf of a minor child by her parents against the manufacturer of a car safety seat, the parties filed dozens of motions in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JOHNSTOWN, Pa. &#8211; In anticipation of the Jan. 17 personal injury products liability trial in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania of claims for chemical exposure brought on behalf of a minor child by her parents against the manufacturer of a car safety seat, the parties filed dozens of motions in limine, which the presiding judge addressed in an omnibus order entered Jan. 12 (Madisyn S. Miller, et al. v. Evenflo Co. Inc., No. 09-108, W.D. Pa.; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151376).<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/lexisnexis/topstories/~4/xf0o2gIErtA" height="1" width="1"/></p>
<p>View full post on <a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/lexisnexis/topstories/~3/xf0o2gIErtA/xlink" >LexisNexis® Mealey&#8217;s™ Daily Legal News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawadvice.ws/pennsylvania-trial-expected-on-product-liability-claims-against-car-seat-maker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cruise Lines Use Law and Contracts to Limit Liability &#8211; New York Times</title>
		<link>http://www.lawadvice.ws/cruise-lines-use-law-and-contracts-to-limit-liability-new-york-times/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawadvice.ws/cruise-lines-use-law-and-contracts-to-limit-liability-new-york-times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contracts.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cruise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawadvice.ws/cruise-lines-use-law-and-contracts-to-limit-liability-new-york-times/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NDTV Cruise Lines Use Law and Contracts to Limit LiabilityNew York TimesAnyone trying to sue Costa Concodia&#39;s corporate parent, Carnival Cruise Lines, though, will find that the company is stoutly protected by international law and by a carefully worded contract that passengers accept when they buy their tickets. &#8230;Must a captain be the last one [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="7" style="vertical-align:top;">
<tr>
<td width="80" align="center" valign="top"><font style="font-size:85%;font-family:arial,sans-serif"><a target="_blank" href="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&amp;fd=R&amp;usg=AFQjCNFkSGPWwB-GbhjXcoGjIQQ3Y_dxMg&amp;url=http://www.ndtv.com/article/world/un-agency-mulls-changes-to-maritime-law-after-italy-disaster-167679" ><img src="//nt2.ggpht.com/news/tbn/HrMEkFSwxEGKUM/6.jpg" alt="" border="1" width="80" height="80" /><br /><font size="-2">NDTV</font></a></font></td>
<td valign="top" class="j"><font style="font-size:85%;font-family:arial,sans-serif">
<div style="padding-top:0.8em;"><img alt="" height="1" width="1" /></div>
<div class="lh"><a target="_blank" href="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&amp;fd=R&amp;usg=AFQjCNEYS_kJgA2vVhHrwgbc8eXCs9aASQ&amp;url=http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/19/world/europe/cruise-lines-use-law-and-contracts-to-limit-liability.html" ><b>Cruise Lines Use <b>Law</b> and Contracts to Limit Liability</b></a><br /><font size="-1"><b><font color="#6f6f6f">New York Times</font></b></font><br /><font size="-1">Anyone trying to sue Costa Concodia&#39;s corporate parent, Carnival Cruise Lines, though, will find that the company is stoutly protected by international <b>law</b> and by a carefully worded contract that passengers accept when they buy their tickets. <b>&#8230;</b></font><br /><font size="-1"><a target="_blank" href="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&amp;fd=R&amp;usg=AFQjCNEXf-ZmeVqFRSV6GlxahCD7p2PAvA&amp;url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-16611371" >Must a captain be the last one off a sinking ship?</a><font size="-1" color="#6f6f6f"><nobr>BBC News</nobr></font></font><br /><font size="-1"><a target="_blank" href="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&amp;fd=R&amp;usg=AFQjCNGMhxqLb4-0I3yJYjfOTg5wJ45fwA&amp;url=http://edition.cnn.com/2012/01/17/travel/cruise-ship-passenger-safety/?hpt%3Dhp_mid" >In a cruise ship crisis, what should happen?</a><font size="-1" color="#6f6f6f"><nobr>CNN International</nobr></font></font><br /><font size="-1"><a target="_blank" href="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&amp;fd=R&amp;usg=AFQjCNFkSGPWwB-GbhjXcoGjIQQ3Y_dxMg&amp;url=http://www.ndtv.com/article/world/un-agency-mulls-changes-to-maritime-law-after-italy-disaster-167679" >UN agency mulls changes to maritime <b>law</b></a><font size="-1" color="#6f6f6f"><nobr>NDTV</nobr></font></font><br /><font size="-1" class="p"><a target="_blank" href="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&amp;fd=R&amp;usg=AFQjCNEOLHwV0GwunGHM1vGJ5mMp-06lBQ&amp;url=http://www.thepeninsulaqatar.com/qatar/179934-editorial-cruise-lessons.html" ><nobr>Peninsula On-line</nobr></a>&nbsp;-<a target="_blank" href="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&amp;fd=R&amp;usg=AFQjCNEIWn5ZZXZxAG29e6qIjuI3l-KvsA&amp;url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-01-18/should-the-captain-go-down-with-his-ship3f/3780068?site%3Dsydney" ><nobr>ABC Online</nobr></a>&nbsp;-<a target="_blank" href="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&amp;fd=R&amp;usg=AFQjCNEBsC-lUQ863lcPrsw9eFvbj81Y1Q&amp;url=http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2012/01/17/231285.htm" ><nobr>Insurance Journal</nobr></a></font><br /><font class="p" size="-1"><a target="_blank" href="http://news.google.com/news/more?pz=1&amp;ned=us&amp;ncl=dbD9H-kTh-J2XOMPiPnsrCfOuhTZM" class="p" ><nobr><b>all 16,124 news articles&nbsp;&raquo;</b></nobr></a></font></div>
<p></font></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>View full post on <a target="_blank" href="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&#038;fd=R&#038;usg=AFQjCNEYS_kJgA2vVhHrwgbc8eXCs9aASQ&#038;url=http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/19/world/europe/cruise-lines-use-law-and-contracts-to-limit-liability.html" >law &#8211; Google News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawadvice.ws/cruise-lines-use-law-and-contracts-to-limit-liability-new-york-times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

