‘Law of domicile’ should have no veto on the Constitution – Globe and Mail


Globe and Mail
'Law of domicile' should have no veto on the Constitution
Globe and Mail
It is an untenable, mechanistic argument – that the “law of domicile,” in effect, defeats the Canadian Constitution. Impossible. And unjust. And it is good to hear Justice Minister Rob Nicholson promise to fix this injustice. The case involves a woman
Conservatives suggest divorce law could be revised to help same-sex couplesToronto Star
Justice Minister looks to clarify law so same-sex marriages 'can be undone in National Post (blog)
'The law recognizes same-sex marriage in Canada'Macleans.ca
CBC.ca -CTV.ca
all 275 news articles »

View full post on law – Google News

, , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Get Adobe Flash player
SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline
© 1992-2012 DC2NET™, Inc. All Rights Reserved