Despite Broad Holding on Whistleblower Standing in False Marking Cases, Pleading Hurdle Is High

Patent practitioners say the Federal Circuit’s decision that whistleblowers have standing to sue companies that falsely label their products as covered by patents probably won’t save cases filed based on the bare fact that products contain false markings. The unanimous panel ruling, which reversed a New York federal court decision, directs the lower court to consider whether the complaint failed to allege an intent to deceive with enough specificity to meet the pleading requirements for fraud.

View full post on Law.com – Newswire

, , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes
SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline
© 1992-2012 DC2NET™, Inc. All Rights Reserved