Court Reverses Bankruptcy Discharge Dismissal; Evidence Of Ascertainability Lacking
LOS ANGELES – A judge improperly found that Kmart Corp.’s bankruptcy discharged a man’s asbestos claims because the record contains no evidence of the ascertainability of the claim when the company filed for bankruptcy, a California appeals court held Jan. 25 (Rachel Flores, et al v. Kmart Corp., No. B229109, Calif. App., 2nd Dist., Div. 5).
View full post on LexisNexis® Mealey’s™ Daily Legal News
Ascertainability, bankruptcy, Court, discharge, dismissal, EVIDENCE, lacking, reverses